This study evaluated the feasibility of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a liquid biopsy source for colorectal cancer (CRC) using two predefined cohorts: 97 patients for analytical validation and 63 patients for postoperative survival analysis. We compared urinary EVs, urinary cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA), plasma EVs, and plasma ctDNA across multiple molecular dimensions, and assessed the utility of urinary EV-DNA for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection. Urinary EVs exhibited larger particle size (median 175.6 nm) and markedly higher purity, demonstrated by a substantially broader proteomic profile (4674 vs. 476 proteins) and significantly higher expression of EV-specific markers (CD63, CD81, CD9). DNA extracted from urinary EVs showed the highest concentration and best preservation of nucleic acid integrity, with the greatest Long/Short fragment ratio, outperforming all plasma-derived samples. Mutation detection sensitivity was comparable across sample types but was highest in plasma ctDNA (39.2%) and urinary EV-DNA (34.0%), exceeding urinary ctDNA (21.6%). In the survival cohort, MRD positivity-defined as detectable RAS/BRAF mutations in urinary EV-DNA 1 month after curative surgery-was strongly associated with inferior outcomes (HR for recurrence 5.25, 95% CI 1.74-15.80), and overall survival was significantly worse in MRD-positive patients. These findings indicate that urinary EVs provide highly pure vesicles with superior DNA quality, making them a robust and completely non-invasive source for molecular profiling. Urinary EV-DNA-based MRD assessment shows significant prognostic value and may serve as a practical tool for postoperative monitoring and risk stratification in colorectal cancer.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shintaro Kanaka
Nippon Medical School
Takeshi Yamada
Nippon Medical School
Fumi Asai
Japan Research Institute
Cancer Science
Nippon Medical School
Japan Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kanaka et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ccb63f16edfba7beb87eea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70368