Remaining Useful Life (RUL) prediction is a key component of prognostics and health management for modern industrial systems. While deep learning methods have significantly improved prediction accuracy, many existing approaches rely on large neural networks that are difficult to deploy on resource-constrained edge devices. This study presents a deployment-oriented evaluation of compact neural networks for RUL prediction using the NASA C-MAPSS turbofan engine benchmark. Two lightweight hybrid architectures, CNN–GRU and CNN–TCN, were developed with approximately 28k–32k parameters to represent realistic models for CPU-based edge inference. A systematic experimental analysis was conducted across all four C-MAPSS subsets (FD001–FD004), which represent increasing levels of operational and fault complexity. In addition to baseline performance, two post-training compression techniques (i.e., global unstructured magnitude pruning and dynamic INT8 quantization) were evaluated. To assess real deployment behavior, inference latency was measured on both a high-performance Intel x86 workstation and a resource-constrained ARM platform. Results show that CNN–GRU generally achieves higher predictive accuracy, whereas CNN–TCN provides more consistent and lower inference latency due to its convolution-only temporal modeling. Unstructured pruning can yield modest improvements in prediction accuracy, suggesting a regularization effect, but it does not reliably reduce model size or latency on standard CPUs due to the overhead associated with pruning masks. Dynamic quantization substantially reduces model size (particularly for CNN–GRU) while preserving predictive accuracy; however, it increases runtime latency because of additional quantization and dequantization operations. These findings demonstrate that compression techniques commonly used for large models do not necessarily translate into deployment benefits for already compact RUL architectures and highlight the importance of hardware-aware evaluation when designing edge prognostics systems.
Bakhtiyari et al. (Sat,) studied this question.