Eating disorders (EDs), including anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge-eating disorder (BED), are complex psychiatric conditions characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Increasing evidence suggests that beyond disorder-specific symptomatology, shared transdiagnostic mechanisms contribute to their onset and persistence. This narrative review synthesizes current data on neurobiological and nutritional factors implicated in EDs, with particular emphasis on trait–state interactions and starvation-induced neuroadaptations. Predisposing vulnerabilities such as heightened anxiety, cognitive rigidity, and perfectionism appear to interact with state-dependent biological alterations induced by malnutrition. Chronic dietary restriction is associated with measurable alterations in serotonergic and dopaminergic systems, altered reward processing, and persistent activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Experimental studies suggest that acute tryptophan depletion may transiently reduce anxiety in individuals with anorexia nervosa, suggesting that, in some individuals, food restriction may function as a biologically reinforced strategy of affect regulation. Furthermore, disturbances in leptin and ghrelin signaling, along with widespread micronutrient deficiencies—including zinc, iron, selenium, and B vitamins—may exacerbate cognitive inflexibility, mood instability, and impaired decision-making. These metabolic and endocrine adaptations may contribute to a self-perpetuating cycle in which starvation-induced neurochemical changes reinforce restrictive or dysregulated eating behaviors. Importantly, several of these mechanisms extend beyond anorexia nervosa and may represent common transdiagnostic processes across eating disorders and related mental health conditions, including anxiety, depression, and addictive behaviors. Recognition of these biological and nutritional factors has significant implications for treatment. Nutritional rehabilitation should be conceptualized not solely as weight restoration, but as a neurobiological recalibration of stress regulation, reward sensitivity, and affective processing systems. An integrative treatment approach that combines behavioral stabilization with attention to underlying neurobiological and relational mechanisms may offer a more comprehensive framework for long-term recovery.
Łucka et al. (Mon,) studied this question.