ABSTRACT Aim To explore factors affecting research engagement among Nurses, Midwives and Allied Health Professionals (NMAHPs) in England by examining perceptions of research capacity at organisational, team and individual levels. Introduction Research engagement strongly correlates with improved care quality. However, NMAHPs face persistent participation barriers compared to medical colleagues, limiting the development of a multi‐professional research workforce. Design National descriptive cross‐sectional study using a validated survey tool. Methods Data from NMAHPs across England were collected using the validated Research Capacity and Culture tool. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and inferentially; qualitative free‐text responses were evaluated thematically. Results Perceived capacity was moderate organisationally and in teams. Organisational strengths included promoting evidence‐based practice (68.7%) and leadership support (61.6%). Teams offered moderate research opportunities (58.6%) but limited mentorship (47.9%). Individually, participants showed competence in literature review (69.5%) and data collection (63.4%) but required support for funding acquisition (43.8%) and publication (50.0%). Qualitatively, research was a highly valued aspect of professional identity, though participation is severely constrained by structural conditions, including extreme resource pressures, unclear career pathways, and professional inequality. Conclusions Despite strong motivation for evidence‐based practice, significant structural barriers restrict NMAHP research engagement. Strengthening capacity demands coordinated action across clinical and policy systems, ensuring equitable access to protected time, mentorship, and vital research infrastructure. Relevance for Clinical Practice Supporting NMAHPs in research enhances evidence‐informed decisions and service innovation. Embedding research into everyday clinical work, rather than viewing it as optional, builds a sustainable multi‐professional culture. Impact This survey pinpoints the specific factors most strongly influencing NMAHP research engagement. It provides healthcare leaders actionable insights to build sustainable research infrastructure and inclusive clinical academic pathways. Reporting Method This study adhered to STROBE guidelines for cross‐sectional research. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.
Ali et al. (Sun,) studied this question.