This study investigated seasonal and sex-based differences in psychological responses and area-of-interest (AOI)-based visual attention, as well as the associations between these variables, using images of the same forest-healing landscape captured in summer and autumn. A total of 40 adults (20 males and 20 females) participated in an eye-tracking experiment combined with psychological assessments, including the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS-11) and semantic differential (SD) evaluations. Mixed-design ANOVA results indicated that perceived restorativeness remained stable across seasons, whereas emotional evaluations were significantly higher in autumn than in summer. Significant interaction effects between season and sex were observed in selected gaze metrics within the sky AOI, while the forest AOI showed a consistent main effect of sex across seasons. Spearman’s correlation analysis revealed a strong positive association between autumn PRS and SD scores, suggesting that aesthetic appreciation contributes to restorative perception. In addition, a significant negative correlation between forest and pond AOIs in autumn indicated a seasonal redistribution of visual attention. These findings highlight the importance of component-level landscape analysis and demonstrate that seasonal variation and user characteristics jointly influence perceptual and attentional responses in forest-healing environments. The results provide empirical implications for evidence-based forest landscape design and seasonal management strategies.
So-Yeon Kim (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: