This essay argues that the black box—both as cryptic device and as critique of illegibility—is not unique to modern technology and has deep roots in the medieval Mediterranean world. Technical opacity was frequently addressed in Latin and Arabic sources, often with a critical undertone. Then as now, technoskeptical writers saw the self-acting device as treacherous, due to its reliance on hidden labor and mechanisms. This critique arose especially in relation to unfamiliar or foreign devices, like animated idols; as such, it was often racializing, attributing opacity as well as deceit to the object and its makers. Modern critiques of technology that focus on invisible labor may reproduce similar biases by enforcing a privileged, first-world perspective. A transhistorical approach thus not only shows the enduring history of the black box; it also illuminates the religious genealogy of techno-skepticism, as well as the biases that inhere in the black box, especially when deployed as a critical discourse.
Lamia Balafrej (Tue,) studied this question.