The concept of the double movement, as expounded by Polanyi (1944/2001), has been a focal point of interest for numerous scholars. However, it is evident that more concerted efforts are required to foster a substantive dialogue among these scholars. Goodwin (2018) took a significant step by initiating a constructive discussion aimed at revitalizing the double movement theory, with the intent of rendering it pertinent to addressing the socioeconomic challenges faced by societies in the Global South. Regrettably, Goodwin’s approach, which primarily leans towards a political system perspective, is not without its limitations. Therefore, this article proposes a societal approach that emphasizes bolstering society’s countermovements as a means of effecting change. To illuminate the factors contributing to the success of Polanyian countermovements in the past two decades, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review. Our methodology adhered to the PRISMA checklist and involved analyzing a vast corpus of articles from prominent databases, including Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Wiley. From the initial pool of 5,111 articles, we identified five that met the research’s specific criteria. Utilizing a narrative analysis approach, we identified five key determinants of countermovement success: the Mainstreaming Justice Claim, Master Frame, Individual Acts, Intervention of External Agents, and Slow Justice. These findings have significant implications for societies in the Global South in the Asia-Pacific region, offering potential strategies for self-preservation and empowerment. Moreover, they have the potential to enhance the applicability and relevance of the double movement theory in elucidating contemporary dynamics within capitalist societies.
Isnadi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.