• Outdoor-validated passive cooling with Cleartran ZnS (CG) + 3 M solar-control film. • Sky-directed daytime longwave heat flux Q CG via the Cleartran path. • TiO 2 –SiO 2 nanparticles (NPs) on CG increases the passive cooling flux. • NPs improve cooling with air in skylight: 38.5 to 54.0 W/m 2 , CO 2 45.8 to 63.0 W/m 2 . • Using air/NH 3 (2:1) peaks at ≈ 66 W/m 2 ; NPs gain is modest (+3.6%). Rising cooling demands motivate passive alternatives to air conditioning. This study evaluates a transparent skylight window for daytime passive radiative cooling (PRC) under outdoor summer conditions in Turku, Finland. A heated box held a two-sided skylight window (0.72 m × 0.225 m × 0.08 m). The skylight consists of standard window glass (SWG) and circular Cleartran® ZnS inserts (CG). The inserts (Ø 0.10 m) were positioned diagonally in the lower window facing indoors and in the upper window facing the sky. The upper SWG carried a 3 M solar-control thin film (TF, ∼65% solar reflectance). The sky facing CG surfaces were covered with dispersed TiO 2 –SiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs, ≈30% areal coverage). The skylight gas volume contained air, CO 2 , or air/NH 3 (2:1). A pyrgeometer provided local weather data as long-wave (LW) irradiance (L↓). Overall performance is reported as the sky-directed net LW radiative heat flux, split into Q CG (CG insert region, with and without NPs) and Q SWG+TF (SWG region covered by TF). The SWG + TF surface is effectively opaque in the LW range (4–14 µm). On a clear summer day (14:00–20:00), Q CG increases 38.5 → 54.0 W/m 2 for air (+40.3% with NPs), 45.8 → 63.0 W/m 2 for CO 2 (+37.6%), and 63.5 → 66.0 W/m 2 for air/NH 3 (+3.6%). NPs increase thermal radiation via CG. Because NH 3 strongly participates in the 8–14 µm atmospheric window, the additional benefit from NPs is smaller, even though the total radiative flux is highest.
Gangisetty et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: