What question did this study set out to answer?

This review aims to compare various computational models designed to predict the bone fracture healing process, focusing on their methodologies and effectiveness.

April 4, 2026Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology0 citationsOpen Access

Computational models for predicting bone fracture healing: a review of modeling approaches, predictions, and emerging strategies

DPDiogo G. Pires ACA. Completo MSMarco P. Soares dos Santos

Key Points

This review aims to compare various computational models designed to predict the bone fracture healing process, focusing on their methodologies and effectiveness.
Analyzed 60 computational models on fracture healing from Scopus database (2000–2025)
Employed systematic search with targeted keywords and predefined criteria for inclusion
Reviewed mechanical, biological, mechanobiological, ultrasound, and bioelectronic model dynamics
Evaluated models based on computational frameworks, accuracy, and limitations
Mechanical and biological models provide fundamental predictions like stress distribution and vascularization but lack physiological complexity.
Mechanobiological models predict tissue differentiation effectively, showing qualitative agreement with in vivo histological patterns.
Ultrasound models enable non-invasive assessment but face limitations due to simplified boundary conditions.
Bioelectric models demonstrate a sensitive method for evaluating fracture healing.

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objective: The development of computational models for predicting bone fracture healing process holds strong potential to optimize therapeutic management in non-unions and delayed healing, reducing healthcare costs and disability-adjusted life years. The main goal of this study is to provide a thoroughly comparative analysis to computational models already proposed to predict fracture healing, including methodologies, mathematical frameworks, validation techniques, and comparative findings across different studies. Methods: This review analyzes 60 computational models selected through a systematic search in the Scopus database (2000–2025) using targeted keywords and rigorously screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for simulating bone fracture healing, focusing on mechanical, biological, mechanobiological, ultrasound, and bioelectronic dynamics, employing FEM and artificial intelligence techniques. The effectiveness of each model in predicting healing progression was assessed by analyzing their computational frameworks, accuracy, and limitations. Results: Comparative analysis revealed that both mechanical and biological models provide fundamental predictions related to fracture healing (e.g., stress distribution and vascularization), but they often lack the physiological complexity demanded for clinical application. Mechanobiological models accurately predict tissue differentiation by combining mechanical stimuli, with strong qualitative agreement with in vivo histological patterns. Ultrasound models have been effective for non-invasive structural assessment, despite existing limitations due to simplified boundary conditions. Notably, the development of bioelectric models has been demonstrating a highly sensitive approach for assessing fracture healing. Conclusions:This study highlights that multidomain computational frameworks combining mechanobiological dynamics with dielectric properties hold significant potential to personalize the clinical management of delayed bone healing.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper