Abstract Refractory multi-principal element alloys (RMPEAs) combine a chemically disordered lattice with a structurally ordered, single‐phase body‐centered cubic (bcc) crystal structure. Chemical fluctuations in these alloys give rise to significant energy barriers that impede dislocation motion. In this study, we use phase field dislocation dynamics to examine how spatial temperature fluctuations compete with randomness in energy barriers to affect the motion of long screw dislocations in three equi-atomic MoNbTa‐based RMPEAs: MoNbTa, MoNbTaW, and MoNbTaVW. Over a wide range of homologous temperatures (T h ≈ 0–0.6), we determined a screw dislocation ‘flow stress’ as the minimum applied stress to sustain continuous motion over a long excursion distance within a fixed timeframe. All three RMPEAs exhibit temperature dependent flow stress with three characteristic glide regimes: at low homologous temperatures, flow stress drops sharply, and screw glide remains planar and rectilinear; at intermediate homologous temperatures, the flow stress levels off as glide becomes planar but wavy; and at high homologous temperatures, flow stress plateaus as screws exhibit nonplanar, three‐dimensional motion. Glide kinetics and transition temperatures are controlled by the chemically induced fluctuations in the energy landscape. The rectilinear to wavy transition temperature is controlled by statistically weakest local barriers in the glide plane, whereas the wavy to 3D transition temperature is governed by statistically strongest local barriers. At low and intermediate homologous temperatures, the relative spread in energy barriers governs glide behavior by controlling the local kinetics of kink pair formation and kink pinning. At high homologous temperatures, the average barrier height governs the glide behavior by controlling the number of out-of-plane excursions during 3D glide. These findings reveal how random chemical fluctuations determine screw‐driven plasticity in RMPEAs, providing critical insight for the design of high temperature structural alloys.
Jones et al. (Fri,) studied this question.