ABSTRACT While antibiotics boost livestock productivity and reduce disease risk, their overuse raises public health concerns, notably antimicrobial resistance. This study examines livestock insurance as an alternative to direct regulation of antibiotic use, like bans or prescription mandates. We present a framework showing how insurance interacts with antibiotics' dual roles, both risk‐reducing and risk‐increasing, and test it using a natural policy experiment in China. Using survey and insurance data, we apply difference‐in‐differences models and find that insurance significantly increases antibiotic use among hog farmers. This suggests antibiotics act as risk‐increasing inputs at current levels. Our findings highlight the need to align insurance with sustainable livestock and antibiotic stewardship strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Qingyin Cai
Tong Wang
Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Calum G. Turvey
Cornell University
Agribusiness
Cornell University
Louisiana State University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cai et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d893c96c1944d70ce04c87 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70093
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: