Fenestrated TEVAR and cervical debranching both achieved high technical success (95% vs 100%) with no 30-day deaths or major strokes, though debranching carried more local access complications.
Cohort (n=36)
No
Do complex endovascular aortic repair techniques provide acceptable safety and durability in patients with aortic arch and thoracoabdominal pathologies?
Patients with complex aortic pathologies (aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aorta)
Complex endovascular aortic repair (including hybrid debranching, fenestrated and branched TEVAR, custom-made, off-the-shelf, and physician-modified endografts)
Technical success rates, perioperative risk, and mid-term durability
Complex endovascular aortic repair is a viable, increasingly standardized strategy with high technical success and acceptable risk for aortic arch and thoracoabdominal pathologies.
Absolute Event Rate: 95% vs 100%
Aortic arch and thoracoabdominal pathologies remain associated with high morbidity and mortality when treated with open surgical repair. Over the past two decades, endovascular techniques have progressively expanded into these complex anatomical regions. This cumulative dissertation synthesizes clinical and technical contributions aimed at improving the safety, applicability, and durability of complex endovascular aortic repair. The portfolio integrates single-center studies, multicenter registry analyses, systematic reviews, and technical feasibility reports. In the aortic arch, it evaluates hybrid debranching strategies, fenestrated and branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and refined techniques to reduce neurological complications. Particular focus is placed on left subclavian artery management and the feasibility of endovascular repair in patients with mechanical aortic valves. In the thoracoabdominal aorta, the work examines custom-made, off-the-shelf, and physician-modified endografts, as well as the durability of bridging stents and renal target vessel preservation. The findings demonstrate high technical success rates, acceptable perioperative risk, and improving mid-term durability across complex anatomies. Collectively, these studies illustrate the evolution of endovascular aortic surgery into a viable and increasingly standardized treatment strategy for complex aortic disease, contributing to expanded patient eligibility and refined complication management.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nikolaos Konstantinou (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Aortic arch and descending aortic lesions (n=36). Fenestrated TEVAR (fTEVAR) vs. Cervical debranching (dTEVAR) was evaluated on Technical success. Fenestrated TEVAR and cervical debranching both achieved high technical success (95% vs 100%) with no 30-day deaths or major strokes, though debranching carried more local access complications.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d894526c1944d70ce054a6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.36643
Nikolaos Konstantinou
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...