Both AS and ASC abutments achieved acceptable clinical short-term outcomes for maxillary anterior implant restorations, with 100% observed implant survival rates and no statistically significant differences in survival or peri-implant bone level stability. The AS group exhibited potential advantages in soft-tissue contour and buccal bone thickness preservation. Although the incidence of mechanical complications was higher in the AS group clinically, the difference did not reach statistical significance, warranting further validation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Xiaying Ding
Y. Wang
Y. Wang
Clinical Oral Implants Research
University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Stomatology Hospital
Zhejiang University Medical College Affiliated Stomatological Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ding et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8962d6c1944d70ce07818 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70128