Livestock manure management contributes substantially to agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, making the adoption of low-carbon approaches urgent in ecologically sensitive regions. This study focuses on the County-wide Livestock Manure Resource Utilization Project in Danjiangkou City, the core water source area of China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Based on field survey data, IPCC Guidelines, and a life cycle assessment framework, this study established a carbon accounting boundary covering excretion, collection, storage, treatment, and utilization stages. A scenario analysis was conducted to compare 2023 baseline emissions with 2026 project emissions and to quantify the carbon reduction potential. The research findings indicate that the overall carbon reduction rate following the project’s implementation reached 40.8%. However, the effectiveness varied considerably across the four management models. The Sedimentation–Crop Model and the Housing–Bedding Integrated Model, which employed integrated systemic interventions, achieved reductions of 61.50% and 60.09%, respectively. In contrast, the “124” Healthy Breeding Model and the Raised-Bedding Composting System, which relied primarily on single-stage upgrades, achieved reductions of only 32.04% and 27.70%. This disparity suggests that in decentralized livestock operations, isolated technological improvements fall short; meaningful decarbonization requires systemic interventions across the entire manure management chain. The findings provide a reference for low-carbon livestock manure management and regional development in ecologically sensitive areas.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cancan Wang
Hubei University
Zhenwei He
Hubei University
Jinhui Zhao
Hubei University
Agriculture
Hubei University
National Animal Husbandry Service
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d896a46c1944d70ce0837a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16070819