Background Despite being a cornerstone therapy for granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM), the use of oral prednisone lacks a standardized protocol due to undefined optimal parameters and insufficient large-scale evidence regarding its impact on disease recurrence. Objectives The retrospective cohort study comprehensively assessed the efficacy of oral prednisone for GLM by utilizing a large-scale cohort. It aimed to identify the optimal therapeutic protocol, with the ultimate aim of establishing a robust evidence base to inform standardized clinical guidelines. Methods A cohort of 614 patients diagnosed with GLM was included in this study from January 2017 to December 2024. A three-dimensional evaluation of treatment timing (symptom-to-treatment interval), duration, and initial dosage (both absolute and weight-adjusted) was performed to identify prognostic factors and optimal cutoffs. Results Oral prednisone was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.534, 95% CI: 1.615–3.975, P 6 weeks, dosage ≤ 0.4 mg/kg/day) yielded the most favorable results. The one-year recurrence rate of this group (6.2%) was significantly lower than other groups (all P < 0.05) and comparable to the non-prednisone group (14.6%, P = 0.233). Conversely, the short-interval group (symptom-to-treatment interval: 0–6 weeks) demonstrated the highest one-year relapse rate (33.5%), significantly exceeding that of the non-prednisone group (P < 0.001). Conclusions While oral prednisone therapy may be associated with an increased relapse risk in GLM, an optimized protocol—initiating treatment after a 6-week symptom interval at a dose of ≤ 0.4 mg/kg/day—was identified to mitigate this risk. These findings highlight the paramount importance of treatment timing and dosage, offering a data-driven strategy to refine current therapeutic practices. Prospective studies are warranted to validate this proposed regimen.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Haiyan Zhang
Ruiyang Wu
Jin Chen
PLoS ONE
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8970c6c1944d70ce08478 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341901