This think-piece examines the critical role of community participation in disaster recovery within the context of escalating global risks and the principles of the Sendai Framework and Build Back Bett er (BBB). Despite widespread recognition of participation as a cornerstone of resilience, implementation remains uneven and often tokenistic. Current recovery practices frequently prioritize speed over sustainability, perpetuating vulnerabilities and undermining long-term resilience. The paper argues for a paradigm shift toward inclusive, locally driven recovery processes that integrate risk reduction, equity, and cultural continuity. Drawing on international frameworks and case studies, it highlights how participatory approaches ‐ such as owner-driven reconstruction ‐ enhance legitimacy, transparency, and adaptive capacity. The discussion underscores the need for institutional reforms, fiscal decentralization, and innovative governance and financial models to embed community empowerment throughout the recovery cycle. Furthermore, it positions the International Participatory Charter as a transformative tool to operationalize these principles, linking recovery to broader territorial and landscape considerations enshrined in the UNESCO Florence Declaration on Landscape. Ultimately, the paper calls for immersive engagement and pre-disaster planning to overcome systemic implementation gaps and ensure that recovery becomes a process of regeneration rather than a return to pre-disaster vulnerability.
Moore et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: