Background: Whether there are differences in clinical outcomes between segmentectomy and lobectomy in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare all-cause mortality and lung cancer-specific mortality in patients with lung tumors ≤ 20 mm undergoing these two procedures. Methods: Patients with stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (≤20 mm) who underwent segmentectomy or lobectomy were identified from the SEER database (2008–2022). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves depicted overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between surgical procedures and mortality, reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 9641 patients, 1065 (11.0%) underwent segmentectomy. After 1:1 PSM, 2028 patients had well-balanced covariates. The median follow-up was 43.0 months. In the lobectomy group, 158 all-cause deaths (35.1 per 1000 person-years) and 66 lung cancer-specific deaths (14.7 per 1000 person-years) occurred, compared with 176 and 80 events in the segmentectomy group (39.9 and 18.1 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that segmentectomy, compared with lobectomy, was not associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR aHR, 1.07, 95% CI 0.86–1.34) or lung cancer-specific mortality (aHR, 1.18, 95% CI 0.84–1.64). The results were consistent across tumor differentiation subgroups. Conclusions: Among patients with early-stage (≤20 mm) LUAD, segmentectomy was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause or lung cancer-specific mortality compared with lobectomy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these findings.
Huang et al. (Thu,) studied this question.