Treatment for large critical-sized bone defects and impaired fracture healing remain challenging. Clinically used protein-based osteoinductive factors, such as recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), can be effective; however, they are costly and limited by stability, dose-delivery issues, and safety concerns. Preclinical small molecules offer an alternative because they are chemically stable, scalable to manufacture, and readily integrated for systemic administration or localized release from scaffolds, hydrogels, cements, and implant coatings. With an emphasis on delivery formats and mechanistic themes, this review examines small molecules that have been shown to improve bone regeneration in preclinical models, contrasting those of biological origin with synthetic and repurposed compounds. Across studies, these selected compounds promote osteoblast commitment, differentiation, and matrix mineralization via BMP/Smad signaling and Wnt/beta-catenin (β-catenin) activation, often through glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β) inhibition or relief of pathway antagonism or Hedgehog (Hh) pathway stimulation. Beyond osteoinduction, several candidates address issues that commonly limit repair, including angiogenesis, oxidative stress, inflammatory tone, osteoimmune regulation, and suppression of osteoclast-mediated resorption. Direct head-to-head comparisons are rare across both classes and reporting heterogeneity complicates interpretation. Key translational gaps include limited cytotoxicity and immunologic profiling, dose and release optimization, durability of benefit, and insufficient evaluation of rational combinations. More rigorous in vivo studies, including larger animal models and standardized outcome metrics, are needed to prioritize promising candidates and guide clinical development.
Abdurahman A. Niazy (Fri,) studied this question.