Abstract This paper studies two approaches to relativizing the notions of complete and precomplete numbering. The first one was introduced by Selivanov in the late 1980s, and it strengthens the standard definitions of complete and precomplete numbering. The second one was introduced by Badaev, Goncharov, and Sorbi in the early 2000s, and it is the full relativization of these two concepts. In the first part of the paper, we study how these two approaches differ from each other. In the second part, we study Mal’cev’s object uniquely for the relativized complete numberings.
M. Kh. Faĭzrahmanov (Thu,) studied this question.