Annual area burned correlates with temperature and fuel aridity, yet extreme wildfire outcomes arise from a small fraction of fires and rapid-growth days. This asymmetry indicates that thermodynamic favorability sets background susceptibility but does not determine when extreme growth occurs. This Perspective proposes a cross-scale framework that distinguishes susceptibility from regime-conditioned event-scale realization. At seasonal and regional scales, temperature and humidity influence fuel dryness, ignition likelihood, and fire-season length, explaining substantial interannual variability in area burned. These variables vary smoothly in space and retain signal under aggregation. By contrast, extreme fire growth occurs during short-lived synoptic configurations that organize winds, pressure gradients, and stability into discrete opportunity windows that permit sustained spread. The strongest winds governing rapid spread are intermittent, terrain-structured, and often unresolved in coarse datasets or aggregated indices. Within these windows, terrain interactions, organized flow, and fire–atmosphere feedbacks can amplify growth until circulation patterns shift. Extreme wildfire behavior therefore operates as a gated joint-probability process requiring the coincidence of susceptibility (S), dynamical weather opportunity (W), and ignition (I). Separating susceptibility from realization reconciles strong climate–fire correlations with the dynamical control of event-scale extremes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Janice L. Coen
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research
Fire
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research
University of San Francisco
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Janice L. Coen (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c9ee4eeef8a2a6b1da6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9040164