Diane M Turner-Bowker,1 Shayna Egan,1 Jessica Butler,1 Adrian Jewett,2 Deepali Mitragotri,3 Brandon Foster,2 Alison Skrinar,1 Christina Theodore-Oklota1 1Endpoint Development and Strategy, Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, CA, USA; 2Patient Centered Outcomes, Lumanity, Long Beach, CA, USA; 3Biostatistics revisions to the GSD FAD addressed interpretation issues. Three domain scores (Symptoms Total Score, Sleep Impacts Total Score, and Daily Impacts Total Score) showed acceptable reliability and validity but had notable ceiling effects that may limit responsiveness in some settings.Conclusion: The GSD FAD is a novel, content-valid PRO that measures the humanistic burden of GSDIa and cornstarch treatment regimen, including the signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals ⥠8 years with GSDIa, that yields reliable and valid scores. While developed in a trial setting, the GSD FAD has potential for use in nutritional, behavioral, and/or educational applications.Keywords: GSDIa, patient-reported outcome, content validity, psychometric, reliability, validity
Turner‐Bowker et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: