This article examines the problem of divine justice through a historical, philosophical, and consciousness-based framework. It addresses a central tension in monotheistic traditions: the emergence of doctrines such as sin, heaven, and hell long after the beginning of human existence, raising questions about the fairness of universal judgment under historically unequal conditions. The study analyzes the historical development of monotheistic belief systems and afterlife doctrines, drawing on the philosophy of religion, anthropology, and comparative theology. It further explores the implications of delayed revelation, moral responsibility, and epistemic inequality, arguing that punitive models of salvation generate unresolved philosophical contradictions. As an alternative, the article introduces the Eteryanist perspective, which interprets existence through a multidimensional ontology of consciousness, energy, and developmental continuity. Within this framework, the human being is understood as a consciousness-extension engaged in an evolutionary process rather than as a subject of inherited guilt. The study proposes that a consciousness-based ontology offers a more coherent and universally applicable account of justice than historically contingent punitive doctrines.
Şehrazat YAZICI (Tue,) studied this question.