In agriculture, the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) as active substances in pesticides has increased over recent decades due to their chemical stability, their ability to alter cell membrane permeability, and their capacity to bind to target proteins. However, their intentional application to agricultural soils has led to progressive environmental accumulation. Their high persistence, mobility, and bioaccumulation potential, combined with documented toxicological effects, raise concerns for aquatic organisms and ecosystems. Monitoring surface and groundwater is essential to assess PFAS contamination. Data from the Italian monitoring plan show widespread contamination, despite the existing European regulatory framework designed to safeguard ecosystems and public health. The contamination is likely underestimated because monitoring programs currently target only a limited number of substances and PFAS metabolites and co-formulants are not included. Approximately 46 PFASs have been identified as active ingredients in pesticides, 29 of which are still authorized within the European Union, posing challenges for drinking water production and ecosystem protection. Existing regulatory regimes also differ in their evaluation procedures, which may lead to inconsistent conclusions regarding PFAS applications. Within the framework of the European “One Substance One Assessment” (OSOA) approach aimed at to ensuring the protection of human health and natural resources, this paper examines the properties of PFASs used as active substances in pesticides, their regulatory status, and their monitoring in Italy, highlighting the regulatory inconsistencies that result in the differential treatment of these substances compared with PFASs used in other sectors.
Pace et al. (Tue,) studied this question.