Endometrial cancer (EC) is the sixth most common cancer in women. Its overall incidence has increased by 132% over the past 30 years, reflecting an increase in the prevalence of risk factors. The mortality rate decreased by 15% in the last 30 years, despite the high number of endometrial cancer-related deaths occurring world-wide. An inverse relationship has been observed between the incidence of EC, mortality and socio-economic status: more patients living in low-income countries die from EC because they do not have access to timely and effective treatment. About 80% of EC cases are diagnosed in an early stage and have a good prognosis. However, about 20% of cases present in advanced stages and are characterized by a poor prognosis. The molecular classification proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TGCA) and its surrogate for clinical use allowed the adoption of personalized treatments. The assessment of the status of the MMR has revolutionized the treatment of advanced ECs, leading to significant results both in terms of PFS and OS. In this review we will focus on MMR deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-hypermutated (MSI-H) tumors, which globally account for 20–30% of ECs. The dMMR group encompasses multiple etiologies, including sporadic defects in MMR genes, germline mutations, and hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. Currently, the combination of immunotherapy (I-O) with standard chemotherapy has become the new standard first-line treatment for dMMR advanced or recurrent ECs. Although the main clinical trials involving patients with MMRd/MSI-H ECs treated with I-O and chemotherapy have demonstrated efficacy and long-term control of the disease, a significant number of patients do not respond to treatment (intrinsic or primary resistance) and others develop progression during treatment (acquired or secondary resistance). In this narrative approach the biological and molecular bases of these tumors have been integrated with recent advances involving diagnostic techniques, therapeutic opportunities and the genomic and phenotypical alterations underpinning the mechanisms of resistance. Special attention was given to the need for robust, clinically affordable biomarkers to promptly identify responders and non-responders to the current treatment regimens.
Barberis et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: