Feminist scholar-activists in criminology occupy a paradoxical position where politically engaged research is rhetorically encouraged but structurally constrained. Most definitions assume combining scholarly and activist roles is simply additive. Drawing on institutional anomie theory ( Messner & Rosenfeld, 2012 ), academia exemplifies institutional crisis by promoting expressive commitments like justice while privileging instrumental goals like prestige and productivity. A triadic framework reveals how scholar, activist, and scholar-activist roles are institutionally separated to preserve knowledge hierarchies. Feminist scholar-activists inhabit a liminal space between institutional legitimacy and justice-oriented knowledge practices. Rather than seeking assimilation into anomic structures, feminist scholar-activism constitutes a necessary, strategic transgression.
Shallenberger et al. (Wed,) studied this question.