Purpose This study explores how English Premier League (EPL) fans perceive and respond to oil-backed and hedge-fund foreign ownerships. It aims to investigate the influence of ownership style on fan activism, trust and the social contract between fans and their clubs. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative critical discourse analysis (CDA) was conducted on fan interactions in reddit posts on Manchester United, Liverpool, Manchester City and Newcastle United. Textual, discursive and social practices were examined to understand pronoun use, sentiment, evaluative language and collective identity construction. Comparisons across clubs and ownership types were made to uncover patterns in fan engagement. Findings The analysis reveals that fans consistently balance emotional attachment with rational evaluation. Hedge-fund ownership triggers scepticism, distrust and high activist engagement. On the contrary, oil-backed ownership elicits conditional acceptance when transparency and sporting investment are evident. Fans construct themselves as moral and participatory stakeholders by defending club heritage and negotiating ethical trade-offs for success. Ownership type shapes discourse around trust, loyalty and governance through protest behaviour, pragmatic loyalty and online activism. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to four English clubs and online discourse. It may not capture offline fan behaviour or global perspectives. Nevertheless, it highlights the importance of incorporating fan sentiment into governance decisions and recognising supporters as co-creators of club identity and legitimacy. The findings have implications for investor communication, club management and policy-making regarding fan engagement. Originality/value This research contributes to the understanding of football fan culture in the context of modern football. It integrates CDA with sports management scholarship.
Rashad et al. (Thu,) studied this question.