Rapid urbanization in megacities has exacerbated the spatial mismatch between employment and housing, necessitating effective spatial optimization strategies. However, classical optimization models often rely on the idealized assumption of “proximity maximization,” failing to account for the complex, nonlinear regularities of actual human mobility. To address this disconnect between theoretical modeling and real-world behavior, this study establishes a job–housing balance optimization framework integrated with empirical commuting patterns. Using Shenzhen as a case study, we analyze citywide commuting big data since 2024 to characterize the power law relationship between commuting population size and distance. We propose a novel optimization model that partitions residential areas into “commuting rings” on the basis of observed distance-decay functions rather than simple Euclidean proximity. We applied the proposed method to current and future planning scenarios and successfully generated spatial regulation schemes that decentralize employment functions to peripheral areas while strategically densifying residential zones. By respecting the “heavy-tailed” nature of commuting distributions, this approach offers urban planners a more robust tool for reducing aggregate commuting burdens without violating the behavioral realities of the workforce.
Bai et al. (Thu,) studied this question.