The urgent global need for sustainable infrastructure drives the demand for high-value buildings and waste removal. This paper studies the feasibility of using recycled foam concrete aggregate (FCA) as a substitute for natural coarse aggregate (NCA) in concrete and studies its impact on rheology, mechanical degradation, shear resistance, and the full-range replacement ratio (0–100). The experimental results show that the monotonic change in the workability of fresh concrete determines the lubrication threshold at 60% replacement, which is driven by the volume proportion effect. Beyond this value, capillary suction dominates, and the viscosity rises rapidly. From a mechanical perspective, the porous structure of FCA is conducive to “internal curing” so that moisture is released from the drying interface, but it also becomes a source of defects that change the fault topology. Specifically, the critical transition of the shear failure mode shifts from the debonding of the interface to the crushing of the cross-particle aggregate. At this time, the shear capacity decreases substantially, experiencing a reduction of 71.8% when completely replaced. There is a strong correlation between ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), rebound number, and compressive strength, and a multivariate nonlinear regression model (R2 > 0.85) with non-destructive strength prediction is ultimately obtained. Based on the balance between mechanical capacity and resource cyclability, an optimal alternative zone of 20% to 40% is proposed. This work not only provides a mechanism for multi-scale coupling between pore structure and structural properties but also provides a data-driven method for the safety assessment of lightweight recycled aggregate concrete (RAC).
Liu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.