Background and Objectives: Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and develops through complex interactions between environmental factors, microbial dysbiosis, and host molecular pathways. Although Helicobacter pylori infection is a well-established risk factor, emerging evidence suggests that broader alterations in the gastric microbiome may also contribute to carcinogenesis. However, the associations between gastric cancer-associated microbial taxa and host gene expression profiles remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to identify host gene signatures associated with gastric cancer-related microbial taxa through a descriptive analysis integrating microbiome-derived taxa with transcriptome data. Materials and Methods: Microbial taxa associated with gastric cancer were systematically retrieved from the Disbiome database. Taxon set enrichment analysis (TSEA) was performed using the MicrobiomeAnalyst platform to identify host genes associated with gastric cancer-associated taxa. Importantly, TSEA relies on healthy reference data from the Human Microbiome Project and does not establish gastric cancer-specific interactions or causal relationships. Gene expression levels were subsequently evaluated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PanCancer stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) dataset by comparing tumor and matched normal gastric tissues. Gene interaction network and transcription factor (TF) enrichment analyses were conducted to explore predicted regulatory relationships. Results: Among 64 microbial taxa associated with gastric cancer, 43 were reported as elevated. After removing overlapping taxa across studies, 37 elevated and 21 reduced taxa were retained for analysis. TSEA identified 11 host genes associated with gastric cancer-related microbial taxa. Transcriptomic analysis demonstrated significant downregulation of DPP6 and DLG2, while KDM4D, USP34, and VDR were significantly upregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with normal controls. Network and TF enrichment analyses revealed predicted co-expression and co-localization patterns among these genes, suggesting their potential involvement in immune-related processes, epigenetic regulation, and cellular organization. Conclusions: This descriptive study identifies distinct host gene expression signatures associated with gastric cancer-associated microbial dysbiosis. This study is purely associative and hypothesis-generating; no causal or mechanistic inferences are made. TSEA used healthy reference data and therefore does not reflect gastric cancer-specific host–microbe interactions. The findings provide a basis for future hypothesis-driven research but require validation in independent cohorts.
Albuz et al. (Wed,) studied this question.