This study examines the scientific, historical, and polemical methodology of Imam Abu Mansur al-Maturidi (859–944) within classical Islamic theology, focusing on its epistemological and rational foundations. Using a historical-analytical and comparative textual approach, it analyzes his refutation of theological groups such as the Muʿtazila, Kharijites, Batiniyya, and Qaramiya, alongside his defense of the Ahl al-Sunnah creed. Primary sources, including Kitab al-Tawhid and Ta’wilat al-Qur’an, are examined in light of their authenticity and transmission, while selected recent English-language studies contextualize Maturidi’s thought within contemporary kalam and philosophy of religion. The study demonstrates how Maturidi integrates Qur’anic exegesis, hadith-based reasoning, and rational argumentation to construct a coherent theological system. By bridging classical and modern scholarship, this research contributes to the limited literature on Maturidi’s rational methodology, particularly in post-Soviet academic contexts. It further highlights the relevance of his approach for addressing contemporary theological and philosophical challenges and suggests directions for future comparative research within Islamic theology.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shamshadin Kerim
Yershat Onggar
Serik Tajibayev
Cogent Arts and Humanities
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Islamic Studies
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kerim et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec593e88ba6daa22dab2e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2646779