Modern conflict has long been governed by the logic of deterrence through fear—most notably embodied in the doctrine of mutual destruction. While such frameworks have prevented large-scale wars, they have simultaneously entrenched a system in which violence remains the default language of power. This paper proposes a fundamental shift: from mutual destruction to mutual preservation. It argues that sustainable peace emerges not from the threat of retaliation, but from the alignment of incentives such that no actor benefits from initiating harm. The framework emphasizes early negotiation, accountability for violence, and ethical constraints rooted in enduring civilizational principles. Drawing from both systemic analysis (OODA–C3 dynamics) and comparative religious ethics, this work outlines a new paradigm of deterrence—one that preserves systems rather than threatens their collapse.
Essentia Vera (Thu,) studied this question.