What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to compare in-hospital outcomes for patients with aortic stenosis undergoing either TAVR or SAVR.

April 25, 2026Open Access

C-52 | In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease

Key Result

Comparative inpatient outcomes between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease remain understudied.

Key Points

This research aims to compare in-hospital outcomes for patients with aortic stenosis undergoing either TAVR or SAVR.
Comparison of inpatient outcomes for patients receiving either TAVR or SAVR.
Population includes individuals with aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease.
Inpatient outcomes for TAVR and SAVR in this specific patient group remain largely unknown and require further investigation.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%

Abstract

Patients with aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) often undergo either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Comparative inpatient outcomes in this population remain understudied.

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mir et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Comparative inpatient outcomes between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease remain understudied.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b6088ba6daa22dacf94 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2026.104788

Bookmark

View Full Paper