Road pavement rehabilitation increasingly incorporates innovative surface technologies aimed at improving pavement performance while reducing environmental impacts. In addition to conventional recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) maintenance strategies, advanced pavement surface systems such as reflective coatings, rejuvenator-based self-healing mixtures, and thin low-noise asphalt layers have been developed to enhance durability and functional performance. This study presents a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of four pavement surface technologies using primary inventory data obtained from full-scale road sections. The systems evaluated include a conventional maintenance mixture and three alternative surface solutions: reflective pavement coatings, RAP mixtures incorporating rejuvenator-based self-healing systems, and thin low-noise asphalt layers. The assessment follows ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards and applies the ILCD 2011 midpoint+ (EF 2.0) method. To enable comparability between technologies with different durability, the functional unit was defined as 1 m2 of rehabilitated pavement per year of service life. The results indicate that thin low-noise asphalt layers provide the highest environmental benefits across most impact categories due to significant material savings associated with reduced layer thickness. Reflective pavement coatings decrease several impacts, particularly fossil resource depletion and atmospheric emissions, although higher burdens are observed in some categories due to synthetic binder production. RAP mixtures incorporating rejuvenator-based self-healing systems improve resource efficiency and extend pavement durability but may increase impacts associated with binder manufacturing. Overall, the findings highlight relevant environmental trade-offs between different pavement surface technologies and demonstrate that parameters such as layer thickness, binder composition, recycled material content, and service life strongly influence environmental performance. The study illustrates how comparative Life Cycle Assessment supports the development and selection of more sustainable pavement surface systems.
Rodríguez-Alloza et al. (Thu,) studied this question.