The rapid growth of residential photovoltaic (PV) installations has increased interest in electrical storage units (ESUs) as a means of enhancing self-consumption and reducing surplus electricity fed into the grid. However, in temperate climates characterized by strong seasonal variability in solar generation, the economic viability of residential battery storage remains uncertain. This study examines whether ESUs provide measurable financial benefits under such climatic conditions, particularly after the transition from net-metering to net-billing schemes. The analysis combines empirical household electricity consumption data with simulation-based modeling of PV–battery operation. Periods of surplus energy production during high solar generation were taken into account, as well as periods of increased energy demand in the winter season and technical limitations related to energy storage, including the difference between actual and nominal capacity of energy storage systems. The results indicate that although battery storage increases self-consumption and reduces grid injection during peak generation periods, its economic performance is limited by the seasonal mismatch between electricity production and demand. Consequently, under net-billing conditions, residential ESUs do not automatically ensure economic profitability in temperate climates.
Naworyta et al. (Fri,) studied this question.