The membrane fusion process, mediated by the entry fusion complex (EFC) of the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is crucial for host cell invasion. Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3)-driven mutation bias is a key factor in MPXV’s adaptive evolution during its global spread. However, how these mutations affect the structure and function of EFC proteins remains poorly understood. To address this, we performed genomic mutation analysis on globally circulating MPXV clades Ib and IIb, combined with protein monomer, binary, and quaternary complex structure modeling based on AlphaFold 3 and experimental validation by ELISA. We first delineated the mutational spectra of all 11 EFC proteins, revealing that although EFC proteins in clade Ib are highly conserved, lineage IIb B exhibits extensive APOBEC3-driven mutations and the G9 M142I mutation is identified as a lineage-associated APOBEC3-type mutation of lineage IIb B. Structural predictions revealed that while the M142I mutation does not alter G9 monomer folding, it induces a conformational shift in the G9/A16 subcomplex. Furthermore, within the predicted G9/A16/A56/K2 quaternary complex, this mutation enlarges the interfacial gap and reduces docking stability between the G9/A16 subcomplex and A56/K2. Experimental validation demonstrated that the M142I mutation significantly reduces the binding affinity of G9 for A16 and impairs the recruitment of A56/K2 to the quaternary complex, confirming the computationally predicted mechanism of interface destabilization. These findings highlight a dynamic interplay between APOBEC3-driven evolution and EFC protein structure, demonstrating that the M142I mutation alters EFC complex assembly dynamics and may shift the regulatory balance of the membrane fusion system. These structural changes provide molecular insights into MPXV lineage differentiation, though direct functional assays are required to determine the net effect on viral entry efficiency.
She et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: