This article looks at the conflict between privatization and equity in Indian elementary education by evaluating the role of low-cost private schools (LCPS) in the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE). The RTE system provides free and compulsory education to children between the ages of 6 and 14, lays down school recognition and infrastructure standards, and obliges unaided private schools to provide at least 25 percent of entry-level places to children in the weaker sections and disadvantaged groups, with reimbursement limited to whichever is less between state per-child spending and the school fee. These clauses locate the private schools within a rights-based framework, yet they also add to the historical arguments on whether LCPS increase access to education among poor households or further stratify the system by providing market-driven. The current evidence explains why LCPS are appealing to most families: the parental interest in schooling in English, the perceived low quality of government schools, and the literature that demonstrates that schools in some developing-country locations tend to perform as well (or even better) than government schools at a lower price. Meanwhile, the evidence also shows significant constraints, such as the affordability of the poorest families, inadequate teacher training, questionable quality of instruction in English, reliance on shadow tuition, and being subject to shutdown under RTE recognition regulations. The argument presented in the paper is that LCPS can neither be discussed as a panacea to state failure nor as an industry to be removed in large scale. The RTE framework in question should be construed instead in a manner that safeguards Equity enhances population education and regulates the involvement of the private sector based on child-centred outcomes as opposed to more input-intensive compliance.
Muniya Chiragkumar Kasubhai (Thu,) studied this question.