Artificial Intelligence systems increasingly shape environmental decision making, infrastructure planning, and resource use across public and urban domains. However, prevailing AI trust and governance mechanisms, including labels, certifications, and assurance schemes, remain primarily focused on ethical and legal accountability, with limited operational attention to environmental sustainability. This paper reconceptualises AI trust mechanisms as socio-technical governance infrastructures that can support both ethical assurance and environmental accountability. Drawing on a comparative qualitative analysis of nine AI trust initiatives, the study develops a three-dimensional analytical framework embedding Environmental Performance Indicators across three governance dimensions: trust-building effectiveness, governance readiness, and sustainable adoption. Applying a systems governance lens, the framework examines how governance instruments structure information flows, institutional practices, and lifecycle feedback relevant to environmental performance. It is analytically illustrated through two urban mobility cases, Helsinki’s Whim application and Barcelona’s smart mobility system, to examine how governance conditions enable or constrain the integration of Environmental Performance Indicators in practice. Findings show that current trust mechanisms lack measurable and publicly visible environmental criteria, indicating a gap between AI assurance and environmental governance. The study contributes a systems-oriented framework for evaluating AI trust mechanisms as governance instruments capable of supporting environmental accountability. While exploratory and based on secondary data, the results indicate that future AI trust mechanisms must incorporate measurable sustainability indicators to support eco-efficient and accountable digital transformation.
Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti (Thu,) studied this question.