Background/Objectives: Mental health service utilization gaps remain a persistent global public health challenge. Among the 61.5 million adults with any mental illness in the United States, nearly half went without treatment in the past year, and dropout rates from outpatient services among those who do enter care range from 19.7% to 30.8%. Only 30 to 60% of individuals with lifetime mental illness are in active recovery at any given time. Existing theoretical frameworks, including Andersen’s Behavioral Model, the Health Belief Model, and the COM-B framework, each address isolated phases of the care continuum but offer no unified structure for understanding the complete, sequential journey from first contact through sustained recovery. This article introduces the Access, Initiation, Engagement, Retention, and Recovery (AIERR) model to address this theoretical gap. Methods: A conceptual review was conducted following Hulland’s framework for theory development through narrative synthesis. Literature was identified through targeted searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar, prioritizing peer-reviewed empirical studies, systematic reviews, and foundational theoretical frameworks. Sources were assigned to AIERR stages using predefined decision rules corresponding to each phase’s defining characteristics. Results: AIERR maps five sequential, interconnected stages: Access (structural, cultural, and systemic conditions enabling service reach), Initiation (the transition from provider identification to first appointment attendance), Engagement (active and meaningful treatment participation), Retention (sustained continuity of care), and Recovery (long-term reclamation of life quality and community belonging). For each stage, the framework identifies individual-level and structural-level barriers, facilitating conditions, and targeted intervention points. Conclusions: AIERR advances mental health services theory by unifying previously siloed frameworks, establishing stage-specificity as a core theoretical principle, and reorienting research and intervention strategy toward the upstream structural conditions that produce downstream utilization failures. These theoretical contributions require empirical testing to confirm. Implications for health equity research, clinical practice, and health systems design are discussed.
VanHook et al. (Thu,) studied this question.