Soft story irregularity poses a critical seismic risk to existing building stocks. While current seismic codes define stiffness irregularity factors to detect this vulnerability, they are typically evaluated based solely on initial elastic properties. This study investigates the evolution of these code-defined factors (ASCE/SEI-7, UBC, NBC, TBEC-2018, and BSL) within the post-elastic range to examine how structural damage affects soft story irregularity. The methodology comprises two phases: a low-strength RC plane frame (Case A) and a parametric study on a 3D RC building with incrementally increased ground story heights (Case B). Nonlinear pushover analyses were conducted to track the variation in irregularity factors at each pushover step and examined graphically. Results demonstrate that soft story behavior is not a static characteristic; irregularity factors deteriorate significantly as plastic hinges form. Crucially, several models that initially satisfied code limits in the elastic range eventually exceeded irregularity thresholds under inelastic behavior. This indicates that relying solely on initial stiffness may mask latent irregularities emerging during seismic actions. Consequently, to capture the true severity of soft story mechanisms, it is recommended that stiffness irregularity factors be evaluated at target displacement levels corresponding to the design earthquake.
Aydıner et al. (Thu,) studied this question.