Adhesion between fused deposition modelling (FDM) printed polymers and textile substrates is critical for durable printed-on-textile hybrids. Since no dedicated test standard exists for additively manufactured textile interfaces, many studies use T-peel methods adapted from adhesive-bond standards. However, printed-on-textile joints are often governed by polymer penetration into the fabric and mechanical interlocking, rather than by a discrete adhesive layer. This work evaluates a fixture-based perpendicular (normal-separation) tensile method, using a circular dolly printed directly onto a cotton plain-weave substrate and a fully 3D-printable, threaded, self-aligning clamping assembly. Three representative filaments, namely polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PETG), polylactic acid (PLA), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU), were tested using both the proposed pull-off method and an ISO 11339-type T-peel benchmark, with n = 8 specimens per polymer. The perpendicular method produced complete datasets for all polymers and clearly differentiated adhesion performance (TPU > PLA > PETG). In contrast, for T-peel, the standard evaluation window (25–125 mm) was completed for all PETG specimens but only for a subset of PLA specimens and a single TPU specimen. In the remaining tests, premature substrate failure prevented completion of this window, so the results could not be evaluated. Microscopy confirmed distinct interlocking morphologies across polymers, supporting the observed differences in failure behavior between peel and normal separation. Overall, the results indicate that perpendicular dolly pull-off testing is a practical and reproducible alternative for quantifying adhesion across a wider range of printed-on-textile bonding conditions.
Firicel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.