This study examined the distribution of point-ending outcomes during break-point situations in professional men's tennis, with particular attention to differences between players in the serving and receiving positions and the potential influence of court surface. A total of 1475 break points were analyzed from 80 matches across the four Grand Slam tournaments. Each point was categorized according to its observable outcome, including aces, winners, forced errors, and opponent unforced errors. The analysis revealed significant differences in outcome distribution based on player position. Points won by serving players more frequently concluded with outcomes classified as aces, winners, or forced errors, whereas points won by receivers more commonly ended with unforced errors committed by the opponent. In contrast, statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences in the distribution of these point-ending outcomes across clay, grass, and hard court surfaces. These findings provide descriptive insights into how break points are resolved during high-pressure moments in elite tennis competition. However, it should be emphasized that the outcome classification reflects the final observable event of the rally and does not necessarily indicate the tactical intention or decision-making processes of the players. The results may assist coaches and performance analysts in understanding outcome patterns associated with critical points in professional tennis.
Mourtzios et al. (Thu,) studied this question.