Aero-engine quality assessment under the RAMS framework faces two persistent challenges: the inherent epistemic and linguistic uncertainty in expert evaluation, and the systematic neglect of inter-dimensional coupling. This paper proposes an integrated assessment method that combines Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Sets (IT2FS)-based group decision-making with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). At the measurement level, IT2FS encodes dual-layered uncertainty through the Footprint of Uncertainty (FOU); multi-expert judgments are aggregated via the fuzzy weighted geometric average operator and defuzzified using the Karnik–Mendel algorithm. At the structural level, a reflective second-order PLS-SEM model built on the RAMS framework enables parametric estimation and significance testing of inter-dimensional coupling. Validation on a 63-engine turbofan dataset confirms that all measurement model criteria are satisfied, the second-order model explains 82.4% of the variance in overall quality (R2 = 0.824), and predictive relevance is strong (Q2 = 0.567). Comparative experiments against three benchmark methods demonstrate consistent advantages in quality grade discrimination, information richness, sensitivity to technical improvements, and ranking robustness. These properties position the framework as a statistically rigorous, model-based complement to existing condition-monitoring and digital health management systems for complex propulsion systems, supporting quantitative decision-making within digital engineering programmes.
Wang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.