While substantial research has focused on how political talk can reinforce to or undermine democratic norm, relatively little attention has been paid to the role of incidental political discussion in everyday, nonpolitical contexts. Embedded within contexts of shared, nonpartisan identities or preexisting social relationships, existing theory suggests that incidental political discussion will be less likely to include political opinion and uncivil expression than purposive political discussion. Analyses of nearly 3000 comments on mass shootings and gun control across both political and nonpolitical communities on Reddit show that, contrary to expectations, incidental political discussions are more likely than purposive political discussions to contain expressions of policy opinion. In addition, the level of incivility does not differ between the two kinds of discussions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yibin Fan
University of Washington
Benjamin Mako Hill
University of Washington
Patricia Moy
University of Washington
New Media & Society
University of Washington
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fan et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e90bfa21ec5bbf06d9e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261441875
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: