Background: Automated identification of logistics units is a critical requirement in high-volume warehouse operations, particularly in retails that handle millions of cartons annually. Although barcode-based systems are widely used, they generate recurring costs for labeling, printing, quality control and readability issues, often leading to manual intervention and delays. Methods: This study presents a low-cost and flexible vision-based identification system that directly reads carton identifiers using optical character recognition (OCR). This system designed for edge deployment on resource-constrained hardware and incorporates a rotation-invariant preprocessing pipeline to support robust recognition under real conditions. Proposed approach was tested in two German retails. Results: Tests show recognition accuracies 96% to 98% under operational conditions, with real-time processing performance in the range of 58 to 125 ms per scan, depending on the hardware. These indicate that the system can be integrated into high-throughput logistics workflows. Additionally, the study provides insights into the economic implications of replacing barcode-based identification. Based on site-specific observations and labeling costs, the system shows the potential to reduce manual intervention and lower operational expenses in large-scale retails. Conclusions: Findings suggest that OCR can serve a cost-efficient alternative to barcode systems in environments where flexibility, robustness, and low deployment cost are critical.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohammad Hori Najafabadi
Paria Mahmoudi
Bernd Noche
Logistics
University of Duisburg-Essen
Entwicklungszentrum für Schiffstechnik und Transportsysteme
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Najafabadi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07d4d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics10050100
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: