Persistent Gender Differences in Medicare Practice and Payments to Orthopedic Surgeons

Background: Gender-based reimbursement disparities in orthopedic surgery remain poorly understood, particularly when accounting for practice composition and setting. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate gender-based differences in Medicare reimbursement and practice patterns among female and male orthopedic surgeons. Methods: A cross sectional analysis of public Medicare data from 2013 to 2021 was performed. Outcomes included annual Medicare payments, submitted charges, total services, service categories, and beneficiaries treated by orthopedic surgeons who bill Medicare. Univariate and multivariable analyses quantified differences in payment, practice volume and composition, geographic adjustment, and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)-matched reimbursements. Results: A total of 29,357 orthopedic surgeons (27,442 men and 1,919 women) billed Medicare fee-for-service during the study period. Female surgeons, on average, submitted 48.3% fewer total charges and received 44.1% lower annual Medicare payments per surgeon compared with male surgeons. These differences persisted after multivariable regression adjusted for practice metrics and excluded top and bottom earners. Female surgeons also billed fewer services, treated fewer beneficiaries, and submitted fewer unique CPT codes. However, payment disparities persisted even after matching surgeons by volume of services, beneficiaries, and years in practice. Male surgeons performed higher volumes of all 10 highest-paying orthopedic CPT codes. In CPT matched analyses, female surgeons received lower reimbursement per service than male surgeons performing identical procedures. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the observed gender-based disparities in orthopedic surgery Medicare reimbursement cannot be explained by differences in volume, procedural mix, or geographic practice cost. Instead, they likely reflect a combination of structural and behavioral mechanisms described in prior literature that may influence how access to clinical opportunities, referrals, and reimbursement practices unfold in surgical practices. Variations in coding practices may represent an important focus for future investigation and targeted educational initiatives. Level of Evidence: Level III , Retrospective Cohort Study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.