Qualitative analysis of Chest Pain Unit implementation in China identified 46 barriers and 50 facilitators across 61 key informants, informing a three-pronged strategy framework to optimize ACS care.
What are the barriers and facilitators to implementing the Chest Pain Unit program for acute coronary syndrome in primary care in China?
This qualitative study identified key barriers and facilitators to implementing Chest Pain Units in Chinese primary care, proposing a three-pronged strategy framework to optimize early ACS detection and intervention.
Abstract Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a leading contributor to cardiovascular disease burden in China, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is the most severe ACS. To improve early identification and timely treatment of STEMI patients, the Chest Pain Unit (CPU) program was established to strengthen referral pathways to qualified facilities. This study explores key barriers and facilitators to the CPU implementation and proposes context-specific strategies to optimize its delivery and scale-up. We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in three purposively selected, representative counties across eastern, central, and western China. A total of 61 key informants from 36 township hospitals, participated in the study. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically coded guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0 using Atlas.ti 9. Implementation strategies were mapped and refined using Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change. We identified 46 barriers and 50 facilitators, spanning all 5 domains of CFIR. Technical deficiencies, residents’ lack of health-seeking awareness, financial difficulties, inefficient awareness campaign, and limited professional knowledge are respectively the most significant barriers for five domains. We developed a three-pronged strategy framework including innovation optimization, external empowerment and internal improvement to inform future practice. Accordingly, the most urgent strategies encompass enhancing technical capacity, expanding financing mechanisms, empowering communities, implementing mass media campaigns, strengthening patient adherence through structured follow-up, and providing continuous practical training. We recommend the proposed strategies should be taken into full consideration to facilitate timely detection and intervention of ACS in primary healthcare context.
Liu et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=61). Chest Pain Unit (CPU) program implementation was evaluated on Barriers and facilitators to CPU implementation. Qualitative analysis of Chest Pain Unit implementation in China identified 46 barriers and 50 facilitators across 61 key informants, informing a three-pronged strategy framework to optimize ACS care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: