Activation signature analysis predicted ablation targets in macroreentrant atrial tachycardia with uniform low voltage (0.28mV) lower than peripheral sites (0.71mV, p<0.001).
Observational (n=40)
Does activation signature analysis identify macroreentrant atrial tachycardia bottlenecks characterized by uniform low voltage and slow conduction?
Activation signature analysis can detect potential bottlenecks for predictive targeting in atrial tachycardia, identifying areas with uniform low voltage and slow conduction.
Absolute Event Rate: 0.28% vs 0.71%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND The activation signature, i.e., the number of recording sites activating per unit time, is useful to detect ventricular tachycardia isthmus location. OBJECTIVE We utilized the activation signature for atrial tachycardia (AT) analysis. METHOD In 40 index cases with macroreentrant AT, plus 4 repeat ablations, it was supposed that circuit bottlenecks, the locations of which are predicted ablation targets, could be defined by local activation time intervals in the cardiac cycle having minimized sites activating. Predicted and actual target parameter values were compared for voltage and electrical conduction, versus peripheral (non-target) sites. RESULTS Of 44 procedures, 35 had 1 predicted target, 7 had 2 targets, and 2 had 3 targets, as determined via the signature (N=55 total targets). In 26/44 procedures, a predicted target approximately overlapped the actual target. The mean peripheral voltage was 0.71±0.47mV, versus 0.29±0.27mV at the actual target and 0.28±0.21mV at the predicted target (p<0.001). The peripheral voltage standard deviation was 1.14±1.02mV, versus 0.20±0.15mV at the actual target and 0.26±0.22mV at the predicted target (p<0.001). The coefficient of variation of nearest neighbor activation time difference, with lower values indicative of uniform slow conduction, was 1.99±0.46msec peripherally, versus 1.50±1.08msec at the actual target and 0.73±0.23mV at predicted target (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The activation signature detects potential bottlenecks for predictive targeting in AT patients, using differing criteria and often varying locationally from actual targeting, yet identifying areas with similarly uniform low voltage and uniform slow conduction. Predicted targets often coincide with voltage fissures, where sluggish conduction reinforces the excitable gap.
Ciaccio et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (n=40). Activation signature analysis vs. Peripheral (non-target) sites was evaluated on Mean voltage (p=<0.001). Activation signature analysis predicted ablation targets in macroreentrant atrial tachycardia with uniform low voltage (0.28mV) lower than peripheral sites (0.71mV, p<0.001).