With the increasing frequency of desilting in urban drainage systems, the safe disposal and resource reuse of sewer sediments have become a prominent practical challenge. Screened sand, the most promising component for resource recovery from sewer sediments, still lacks systematic insight into its pollution risks and the necessity of pretreatment. In this study, 120 raw sewer sediment samples were collected from sanitary, storm, and illicitly connected (IC) storm sewers in Shanghai, alongside seasonal screened sand samples. We systematically characterized their physicochemical properties and heavy metal and antibiotic pollution profiles, and evaluated the purification performance of ultrasonic treatment, sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP) washing, and their coupled processes. Results revealed significant differences in sediment properties across pipeline types. Screened sand, dominated by SiO2 and CaO, shows preliminary potential for reuse as a low-grade bulk building material, but its organic loss on ignition (LOI) of 5.29–13.42% exceeded the reuse limit. Concentrations of heavy metals and antibiotics were generally higher in screened sand than in raw sediments, with further enrichment in the fine sand fractions, indicating that screening only redistributed contaminants rather than eliminated them. The coupled ultrasonic–SHMP process, applied for the first time to screened sand from sewer sediments, achieved optimal performance, with a maximum LOI reduction and over 85% removal of certain antibiotics, without damaging the sand’s mineral skeleton. This study provides a scientific basis for the safe resource reuse of screened sand.
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.