Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters such as effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC) are increasingly used to assess tissue microstructure in a system-independent manner. However, their consistency may vary with transmit wave sequences, especially in portable ultrasound systems with reduced power and acquisition constraints. This study evaluates QUS parameter consistency using a portable ultrasound system from Vermon including a 128-element, 6 MHz linear array transducer. RF data were acquired from a sample phantom containing 60-µm borosilicate glass spheres using three transmit sequences: plane wave (PW), focused wave (FW), and synthetic aperture (SA). A reference phantom containing 18-µm scatterers was used to compute the backscatter coefficients (BSC) of the sample phantom via the reference phantom method correcting for system-dependent effects. Two BSC-based parameters, effective scatterer diameter (ESD) and effective acoustic concentration (EAC), were computed by fitting the BSC to a Gaussian form factor model. These values and their coefficient of variation (CV) were computed across 30 mm × 20 mm region using sliding sub-ROIs measuring 10 wavelengths (λ) axially and 30λ laterally. SA sequence produced the most consistent ESD (CVESD = 5.2%) and EAC (CVEAC = 2.4%) estimates, compared to PW (CVESD = 8.5%, CVEAC = 2.6%) and FW (CVESD = 11.4%, CVEAC = 2.6) sequences. These findings suggest SA imaging may offer more reliable QUS parameter estimates for portable ultrasound applications.
Burman et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: