Background Inadequate alveolar bone is a critical challenge for the placement of implants. The tenting screw technique has been demonstrated to be effective for bone augmentation. However, no previous systematic reviews have addressed the clinical outcomes of the tenting screw technique for guided bone regeneration (TS-GBR). Thus, we aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to systematically assess the clinical outcomes of TS-GBR. Methods and analysis We will search eight databases to identify relevant studies. Clinical trials that report the outcomes of bone augmentation with the application of the tenting screw technique and that meet the inclusion criteria will be included. Two authors will independently conduct the literature search and data extraction. The risk of bias of the included studies will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool, Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist on the basis of the study design. Weighted means will be calculated. R software will be used to perform the data analysis. A funnel plot will be generated to assess publication bias. The quality of evidence for each outcome will be assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not applicable since this is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that does not include actual patients or require data privacy. We will summarise the currently available data related to TS-GBR. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSRERO registration number CRD420251043324.
Wang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.